Minnesota Judicial Branch

search case law

To Search By Subject:

Maryland imposed a tax on the Bank of the United States and questioned the federal government’s ability to grant charters without express constitutional sanction. The Supreme Court held that the tax unconstitutionally interfered with federal supremacy and ruled that the Constitution offers the federal government certain implied powers. While searching Dollree Mapp’s house, police officers discovered obscene materials and arrested her. Because the law enforcement officials by no means produced a search warrant, she argued that the materials ought to be suppressed as the fruits of an illegal search and seizure.

Basic Legal Research

After hours of police interrogations, Ernesto Miranda confessed to rape and kidnapping. At trial, he sought to suppress his confession, stating that he was not advised of his rights to counsel and to stay silent. The Supreme Court agreed, holding that police should inform suspects of their rights earlier than questioning.

Search tens of millions of opinions by case name, matter, or quotation. This website is maintained by the Administrative Office of the U.S.

Case legislation is always changing over time as different courts interpret and comment upon earlier decisions. One of the key steps in doing case law analysis is determining whether or not a particular case remains to be relevant to a certain situation. Provides hyperlinks to details about all Illinois courts as well as court docket rules, choices, and contact data. Find information and announcements on present court circumstances, find out about listening to oral arguments, and find out … Read More

Continue Reading

Judicial Branch

search case law

Subject Guide

To locate a case of curiosity, enter a keyword into the search field and use the drop-down menu to choose a jurisdiction, or just click on on a hyperlinked jurisdiction, choose a court and date, after which flick thru an inventory of circumstances. This article rationalises the case regulation of the European Court of Human Rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in deportation instances involving children. The Court engages in a balancing train between the proper to family lifetime of the deportee’s family on the one aspect, and the public curiosity in deportation on the opposite. This article expands on current case law analysis by suggesting that in deportation circumstances, the Court considers Article 8 as a form of commonly held right, quite than a person proper held by one member of the family. Furthermore, the stability is argued to be constructed as a relationship between two elements on both sides, quite than of a sole issue on either aspect as being determinative.

You can search utilizing pure language phrases corresponding to “violations of Fourth Amendment rights,” but you may most probably find that you simply get extra relevant outcomes should you use a authorized database’s particular search terms and filters. Most databases allow Boolean searchingand also allow the use of additional phrases and connectors that will help you get more exact results. Creating a customized search string is an effective way to conduct environment friendly case law resarch.

Implementation should be guided … Read More

Continue Reading

Judicial Decisions

court opinions

Opinions Of The Supreme Court

In addition, the authority rating for the Slaughter-House Cases, whereas rising substantially within the early years after its release, remains at about the 93rd percentile of all Supreme Court majority opinions as of 2005. These two Supreme Court measures thus capture the considerable significance of the opinion, although it could be thought-about a case that settled an necessary space of the regulation. Through its selective certiorari choices, the Court units the agenda for change. Research has discovered that a salient Supreme Court choice produces an increase in circuit court docket choices and amicus briefs and increases the Supreme Court’s agenda of potential instances to build upon the unique determination’s precedent.

We will stay agnostic on the value of the lower courtroom citation counts and report results for every of the court docket levels. These cases rank excessive on the listing due to the frequency with which these authorized issues are adjudicated. The top case on the list, Strickland v. Washington, handled the power to acquire a writ of habeas corpus as a result of ineffectiveness of counsel at trial. While district courts offer more opinions than do the circuit courts, their rulings are sometimes “heavily reality primarily based and jurisdictionally restricted in effect, and they do not set the numerous legal precedents that make up the regulation.” Id. In this section we identify crucial Supreme Court choices on different citation metrics.

We make use of the Supreme Court quotation rely, the lower courtroom quotation rely, … Read More

Continue Reading